Over the last week, we have been making significant progress in clarifying and redefining or policies and procedures.
- We have gone through another review of the journals that were suspended last week, and we have restored a few more of them. We will continue to work with people who feel they have been suspended in error.
- We have had our first call with the EFF and exchanged information about where we are now. They have shared with us some ideas about who they think is doing a good job on these issues. We will continue to consult with them over the coming weeks.
- We have reviewed what we could have done differently with the entire LJ team, and next week we will have a discussion with the abuse volunteers about the same issues.
- We realized that we need to clarify policies and procedures BEFORE we give feedback to journals that were taken down and then put back up. That will not take place for a while, and none of these journals will be suspended again without prior notice unless clearly required by law (that effectively limits it to child pornography or a copyright violation reported under the DMCA).
- A number of you have discussed how we might make amends for our mistakes with the people who had their journals suspended incorrectly and with the community. We have been listening to your ideas, and expect to announce a program this coming Tuesday.
- We have realized that as we review policies it is important to also look into copyright issues. We have opened a dialogue with Creative Commons about ways we can make it easier for users to be clear about content that they are willing to share and content they wish to maintain ownership and control over.
While we have a great deal of work left to do, I want to share with you some of the ideas we are exploring:
One thing that people have been upset about has been the implication that the community standards would be set by Six Apart and not the community. I agree, and I was wrong to imply that. Six Apart is a critical part of the community (with the help of our paid users, we pay for bandwidth, employ the staff, and run the servers), but clearly the LiveJournal team and the LiveJournal users have a critical role in defining what is acceptable on LiveJournal. We know we can learn a lot from other communities that use a combination of reputation software and human judgment to gauge community opinion, and we are now actively exploring how we can let the community "vote" on what is acceptable content in order to create greater consistency.
When I say "vote", I don’t want people to fear that this will become the tyranny of the majority or mob justice. Metafilter, Craigslist, Flickr, Wikipedia, and many, many other sites effectively use these types of systems to make the jobs of their support teams easier and to reflect the standards of the community. Clearly law takes precedent over such votes, but in case where the line is not legal content but rather objectionable or acceptable content, community input can be a great help. Members of the team are starting to explore what is working for whom and we will share these ideas in more depth soon.
How can you help?
- Be patient; we are trying to do this right and incorporate a broad range of feedback, so this will take some time.
- Keep sharing your opinions and your ideas. We really are listening.
- Read these posts. Many questions I have seen have been answered in previous posts, particularly in the update in my first post: http://news.livejournal.com/99159.html
- Volunteer for the abuse team. It takes time and dedication, but you can really help: http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqb
rowse.bml?faqid=57&view=full - Understand that there is no perfect solution, and compromise will be needed.
Following this post, I would like to move this discussion to the
Once again, I want to thank you for your feedback, your ideas, and most of all for your passion for LiveJournal.
← Ctrl← Alt
Ctrl →Alt →
June 9 2007, 00:57:13 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:58:24 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:57:42 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:57:46 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:12:21 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:58:45 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:05:06 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:58:58 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:59:39 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:03:38 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
Deleted comment
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:59:43 UTC 4 years ago
June 10 2007, 04:27:27 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 00:59:55 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:05:09 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:01:44 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:02:01 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:02:07 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:52:22 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:02:40 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 03:17:12 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:02:49 UTC 4 years ago
Deleted comment
June 9 2007, 02:16:02 UTC 4 years ago
I can't believe all the retards who clamber onto these posts and rush to kiss SixApart's collective pustulent ass, then snark at the people who insist on holding 6A's feet to the fire. "OMG GET A LYFE OFF TEH INTARWEBZ HAW HAW HAW!!!"
Oh, wait, yes, I can. This is LJ.
4 years ago
4 years ago
Deleted comment
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:04:11 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:04:17 UTC 4 years ago
While there are steps in the right direction with this post, it does not solve the corporate culture that created the mess in the first place. Are you looking at changing your company mindset as well as your posted policy?
Because that takes real dedication.
June 9 2007, 20:37:33 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:04:19 UTC 4 years ago
June 10 2007, 05:07:33 UTC 4 years ago
Observe-Orient-Decide-Act!
June 9 2007, 01:04:30 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:04:45 UTC 4 years ago
If a journal is suspended/left alone due to the results of an abuse investigation, everyone needs to know. Right now, it seems arbitrary. Why, for example, was
To this effect, set up an official community that not only posts abuse team decisions, but tells the rationale behind them and the number of people involved in reaching that decision.
June 9 2007, 01:07:26 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:05:03 UTC 4 years ago
We realized that we need to clarify policies and procedures BEFORE we give feedback to journals that were taken down and then put back up.
Does this include clarifying the TOS and letting users know ahead of time about changes? One thing that was frustrating about this whole thing was that there was zero warning about deletions.
One thing that people have been upset about has been the implication that the community standards would be set by Six Apart and not the community. I agree, and I was wrong to imply that....We know we can learn a lot from other communities that use a combination of reputation software and human judgment to gauge community opinion, and we are now actively exploring how we can let the community "vote" on what is acceptable content in order to create greater consistency.
I'll be impressed if you guys actually do this.
June 9 2007, 01:57:31 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:05:08 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:07:17 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:05:14 UTC 4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:05:28 UTC 4 years ago
Deleted comment
June 9 2007, 01:08:56 UTC 4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
Deleted comment
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
Deleted comment
Deleted comment
Deleted comment
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
June 9 2007, 01:06:17 UTC 4 years ago
HMMMM??? HAVE YOU???????
Remember, soldiers of fandom: May, the month LJ killed free speech dead with its nefarious bookburning fundie fascist Nazi tactics. ~*~NEVAR FORGET.~*~*~
June 9 2007, 01:48:24 UTC 4 years ago
Seriously people, LJ isn't nearly as important as that thing outside your house called "life". Go outside, go for a run, go swimming, get some sun...ANYTHING!!!
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
4 years ago
← Ctrl← Alt
Ctrl →Alt →